Many Irish SMEs don’t realize they qualify for Research and Development Tax Credits. Our goal is to demystify the technical requirements and qualify criteria.
A company and not a sole trader is entitled to a tax credit for Research & Development.
It is equivalent to 25% of qualifying R&D expenditure incurred in a particular accounting period.
This can be offset against the corporation tax liability.
The base year restriction has been removed, which means the credit is now available on a volume basis as opposed to an incremental basis.
Yes, it’s in addition to the normal Case I deductions for expenditure incurred against trading income.
This may result in a corporation tax refund.
For a 12.5% taxpayer, this can result in a net subsidy of 37.5%. In other words, 12.5% corporation tax deduction + 25% R&D tax credit.
It’s important to be aware, however, that certain restrictions apply to limit the extent of the refund.
Revenue guidelines state that qualifying R&D activities must:
1. Expenditure covered by grant assistance received from the State (i.e. the EU or EEA) does not qualify for the credit.
2. Eligible expenditure includes expenses such as salaries, overheads, materials consumed, etc. which are allowable trading deductions for the purposes of computing corporation tax.
3. Expenditure incurred on plant and machinery may also qualify as R&D expenditure. To do so, however, it must be eligible for wear and tear capital allowances and must be used for the purposes of R&D activities.
4. Expenditure incurred on R&D activities outsourced to a third-party or to third level institutions may also qualify as R&D expenditure for the purposes of the R&D Tax credit. This is subject to certain conditions:
5. Companies who build or refurbish buildings or structures for both R&D and other activities may claim an R&D tax credit in respect of the portion of the construction and/or refurbishment costs that relate to R&D activities.
1. Firstly against the current period’s corporation tax liability.
2. Secondly, where the company does not have sufficient corporation tax liability in the current accounting period, that company can make a claim to carry back the unutilised portion of the tax credit against the corporation tax liability of a preceding accounting period of corresponding length.
3. Thirdly, if any portion of the credit remains after making this claim the company can make a claim under Section 766(4B) for a cash refundpayment of this excess in three instalments. Please be aware that this payment is subject to a cap (see below).
4. Finally, any remaining portion of the R&D Tax Credit will be carried forward and offset against the corporation tax liability of the future accounting periods
The amount of cash refund that a company can claim under (Section 7664B) is limited to the greater of:
1. The corporation tax paid by the company during the period of ten years prior to the previous accounting period i.e. prior to the period in which Section 766(4A) TCA 1997 relief is claimed. It’s important to bear in mind that these payments are reduced by any claims already made under Section 766(4B)TCA 1997 in those earlier periods or
2. The sum of the payroll tax liabilities for the period in which the expenditure on R&D was incurred as well as the prior period’s payroll, subject to restrictions if the company has previously made a claim based on its preceding payroll.
Please be aware that the information contained in this article is of a general nature. It is not intended to address specific circumstances in relation to any individual or entity. All reasonable efforts have been made by Accounts Advice Centre to provide accurate and up-to-date information, however, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate on the date it is received or that it will continue to remain so.. This information should not be acted upon without full and comprehensive, specialist professional tax advice.

Chartered Tax Advisors, qualified Accountants, Payroll Providers, Help with Preparing Tax Returns, Employee/Employer Taxes, Personal Taxes
The Minister for Finance Michael Noonan T.D. presented his 2016 Budget yesterday. As you can appreciate, Accountants and Chartered Tax Advisors have widely anticipated this Budget. In it, he outlined a wide range of changes to the Irish tax system with particular emphasis on:
(i) personal taxation,
(ii) initiatives to begin equalising the tax treatment of the self-employed and employees
(iii) as well as steps to support businesses in Ireland.
We will outline the key features of yesterday’s Budget below.
The Government introduced comprehensive changes to the Universal Social Charge for 2016, aimed at reducing the tax burden on low and middle income earners.
The entry threshold for Universal Social Charge (“USC”) will be increased from €12,012 to €13,000.
Otherwise, rates of USC will be reduced as follows:
The top rate USC exemption will be retained for all medical card holders and individuals aged seventy years and older providing their total income does not exceed €60,000.
There have been no changes to the income tax rates and bands.
Budget 2016 introduced a tapered PRSI tax credit for employees up to €624 per annum.
The entry point to the higher rate of employers’ PRSI of 10.75% will be increased to €376 per week. This will be a welcome introduction by all employers. The reason for this tapered PRSI credit being introduced, is to ensure low income earners benefit from the increase to the minimum wage, which will take effect in January 2016.
The credit applies to individuals earning between €18,304 and €22,048 per annum. it will be subject to a maximum of €12 per week.
The government will be introducing an Earned Income Tax Credit of €550 per annum in 2016. The aim is to equalise the tax treatment of the self employed with employees paid through the PAYE system.
This new tax credit will be available to individuals who are not eligible for the PAYE Tax Credit. This includes:
(i) those earning self employed trading or professional income (subject to Income Tax under Cases I and II Schedule D)
(ii) individuals in receipt of Case III Schedule D income as well as
(iii) business owners who, up to now, didn’t qualify for a PAYE credit on their salary.
There was no reference made to tax relief on pensions in this Budget.
The “additional” pension levy of 0.15% will expire at the end of 2015.
Please be aware that the original 0.6% pension levy ended in 2014.
The Home Carer’s Tax credit increased by €190 to €1,000 per annum.
| The income threshold for the home carer claiming this allowance has been increased from €5,080 to €7,200. This Tax Credit can be claimed by a jointly assessed couple in a marriage or civil partnership where one spouse or civil partner cares for one or more dependent persons which include children, older persons, incapacitated etc. |
Other Points of Interest |
1. An income tax credit worth up to €5,000 per annum for five years was introduced for family farming partnerships to facilitate the transfer of family farms to the next generation.
2. There was an extension of general and young farmers’ stock relief for a further three years.
3. Profits or gains from the occupation of woodlands are being removed from the High Earners’ Restriction.
The Budget has extended the Local Property Tax revaluation date for the Local Property Tax from 2016 to 2019. This follows recommendations in the “Review of the Local Property Tax” report which has also recommended exemptions for properties significantly affected by pyrite.
NAMA is to deliver 20,000 houses between now and 2020. 90% of these in the Dublin area and 75% of the overall total will be starter homes.
1. The Home Renovation Incentive is being extended until 31 December 2016.
2. The existing €5 Stamp Duty on Debit/ATM cards is to be replaced with a 12 cent charge for ATM transactions. This is subject to a cap of €2.50 or €5 depending on the card type.
3. The reduced 9% rate for the tourism and hospitality sector will be retained.
4. There will be no changes to the reduced VAT rate of 13.5% or the standard VAT rate of 23% in 2016.
This is the first time since the Budget in April 2009 that the marginal rate for middle income earners has fallen below the 50% rate.
Please be aware that the information contained in this article is of a general nature. When preparing this article, we did not intend to address specific circumstances in relation to any individual or entity. All reasonable efforts have been made by Accounts Advice Centre to provide accurate and up-to-date information, however, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate on the date it is received or that it will continue to remain so. This information should not be acted upon without full and comprehensive, specialist professional tax advice.
Please be aware that the information contained in this article is of a general nature. It is not intended to address specific circumstances in relation to any individual or entity. All reasonable efforts have been made by Accounts Advice Centre to provide accurate and up-to-date information, however, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate on the date it is received or that it will continue to remain so. This information should not be acted upon without full and comprehensive, specialist professional tax advice.
A number of Revenue Guidance Documents have been introduced. This follows Finance Act 2014 being signed into law on 23rd December 2014. This article will be focusing on the following documents, with specific focus on Capital Gains Tax, Corporation Tax, Relevant Contracts Tax and CAT:
Section 600 TCA 1997 provides that Capital Gains Tax on the transfer of a business and all its assets to a company may be deferred providing four conditions are met:
Any liabilities taken over are to be treated as cash consideration but in practice, Revenue may not enforce this rule in circumstances where:
Revenue has clarified in this eBrief that bona fide trade creditors will not be treated as other consideration for the transfer. By this, they mean genuine trade creditors who provide goods and/or services to the business.
The Revenue Concession does not apply to business debts such as bank loans or tax liabilities.
Finance Act 2012 introduced the Foreign Earnings Deduction (F.E.D.).
It was designed to encourage and incentivise individuals who perform their duties of employment in the specific countries Ireland was targeting for the purposes of business development and export growth.
In 2012 this tax relief applied to Irish resident employees who carried out significant duties in Brazil, Russia, Indian, China and South Africa.
From 2013 to 2014 the list of countries was extended to Egypt, Algeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Kenya, Nigeria, Ghana and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
According to this eBrief the number of relevant states now include: Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Chile, Oman, Kuwait, Mexico and Malaysia.
Prior to Finance Act 2014 the rules for claiming the relief were as follows:
1. The individual must exercise the duties of his/her employment for at least sixty days in the above mentioned countries i.e. those listed from 2012 to 2014.
2. Each visit must consist of four days to be considered for F.E.D. Relief.
3. The formula to determine the deduction was as follows:
Employment Income x Qualifying Days
Total Days
4. Previous legislation capped the deduction at €35,000.
5. “Qualifying Days” related to days carrying out the duties of employment and did not include days travelling.
Finance Act 2014 introduced the following changes for the years 2015, 2016 and 2017:
A day, the whole of which is spent in a relevant state for the purposes of carrying out the duties of an office or employment.
The best starting point in relation to understanding the tax treatment of awards/settlements is Section 192(A) Taxes Consolidation Act 1997:
Now that we’ve established that the main distinction between a taxable award/settlement and a tax exempt award/settlement is the distinction between wages/salary and compensation, let’s look at Section 2B of the Employment Permits Act 2003. This piece of legislation was introduced to prevent or at least deter employers from employing foreign nationals without a valid employment permit.
It allows the foreign national to take a civil action against his/her employer for compensation in relation to work done or services carried out even if there is no legal contract in place.
As the compensation is not deemed to be for an infringement of a right, rather, it’s considered to be the reimbursement of a salary or wages then it is liable to tax.
The compensation is calculated by a court order based on a national minimum hourly rate of pay (or any rate of payment which is fixed under, or pursuant to, any enactment).
The tax treatment of these compensation payments is covered by two new provisions:
which were introduced by Section 37 of the Employment Permits (Amendment) Act 2014.
If compensation payments are made to individuals under Section 2B of the Employment Permits Act 2003 they are liable in full to PAYE and the Universal Social Charge.
They will not be liable to PRSI as they are not treated as “reckonable emoluments” as defined in the Social Welfare & Pensions Act 2012.
Capital Acquisitions Tax is the tax levied on gifts and inheritances received by individuals where the value of the gift/inheritance exceeds that individual’s lifetime tax free threshold amount.
Section 82(2) of the Capital Acquisitions Tax Consolidation Act exempts from tax “normal and reasonable” payments (in money or monies worth) made by the disponer during his/her lifetime for the support, maintenance or education of their:
While carrying out compliance programmes, the Revenue Commissioners identified ways in which this exemption was being abused. As a result, Section 81 Finance Act 2014 amended Section 82 Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 to ensure that where there is a need to provide for the support, maintenance and education of children the exemption is confined to the following:
Revenue’s view is that “normal” refers to the nature of the payment or expenditure. Examples include the payment of fees and accommodation costs for a dependant child attending college.
“Reasonable” refers to the financial circumstances of the disponer. Even though there is no ceiling on the value of what can be provided by way of maintenance or support, the exemption will not apply if the disponer makes payments which are disproportionate to his/her means.
Section 82(2) does not cover all payments by a parent to a child. Revenue does not accept that gifts to a child who is financially independent are exempt from Capital Acquisitions Tax nor does it accept that gifts of a capital nature are tax exempt.
Examples of non-exempt benefits/gifts/payments are as follows:
Before we examine this guidance document, I will briefly explain the Relevant Contracts Tax system in Ireland.
R.C.T. is a tax that applies to the following industries in Ireland:
R.C.T. applies to payments made by a Principal Contractor to a Subcontractor under a Relevant Contract i.e. a contract for a Subcontractor to carry out relevant operations for the Principal Contractor.
Before 31st December 2011, the Principal Contractor was required to deduct withholding tax from the gross payments made to a Subcontractor under a relevant contract and submit this tax to the Irish Revenue Commissioners on the Subcontractor’s behalf. At the time there was only one rate and that was 35%.
The Principal provided the Subcontractor with a Certificate outlining the tax paid on his/her behalf (Form RCTDC 45) and the Subcontractor could then receive a credit or in some cases a refund of this tax withheld once they filed an annual Income Tax Return.
Then, the Principal was required to file a monthly Return of tax deducted (RCT 30) and pay the relevant RCT deducted to Revenue. The Principal Contractor was also obliged to file an Annual Return of Gross Payments and Tax Withheld on an RCT 35 which had to be filed by 23rd February following the year end.
If, however, the Subcontractor had a Certificate of Authorisation or a C2, the Principal could pay the Subcontractor without deducting R.C.T.
On 1st January 2012 the rules changed with the introduction of three rates of withholding tax:
Section 17 Finance Act 2014 introduced a revised sanction for situations where the Principal Contractor fails to operate RCT on relevant payments to Subcontractors. The level of penalty will depend on the percentage of tax withheld from the Subcontractor’s payments.
From 1st January 2015 the Principal will be liable for the following penalties in the event of non operation of R.C.T.
In all the above four situations the Principal Contractor will be required to submit an Unreported Payment Notification to Revenue.
On 14th May 2014 the Irish Revenue Authorities issued a detailed Tax Briefing outlining the tax treatment of the Vodafone Return of Value to its Shareholders. I wrote an Explanatory Blog, which was published on this site on 16lth May 2014, outlining the comprehensive guidance on the calculation of the base cost for Capital Gains Tax purposes. In my Blog, I discussed the Income Tax Treatment for shareholders who opted for “C Shares”:
“individuals who opted for the ‘C Shares’ received a dividend from Vodafone which consisted of (a) a cash amount and (b) shares in Verizon.
The individual was then required to include both amounts in his/her annual Income Tax Return i.e. (a) the cash actually received and (b) the market value of the Verizon Consideration Share Entitlement received.
Income Tax, P.R.S.I. and the Universal Social Charge were then levied on this dividend.”
On 23rd December 2014 Revenue issued additional guidance on the tax treatment where Returns of Value of €1,000 or less were received by Vodafone shareholders. eBrief 107/14 contains details of a tax relieving measure which was introduced by Section 48 Finance Act 2014.
Section 48 Finance Act 2014 allows individuals who received a “Return of Value” payment of €1,000 or less under the terms of the Return of Value to be treated as having received a Capital Sum which, if the individual had acquired the Vodafone shares as a result of originally investing in Eircom back in 1999, would result in a NIL Capital Gains Tax liability.
The individuals can opt to have the payment treated as income should they wish. In this case the payment sum would be liable to Income Tax, PRSI and the Universal Social Charge.
In situations where Vodafone shareholders made a capital loss on the “Return of Value” of €1,000 or less and providing these individuals had no other chargeable gains arising in the 2014 tax year, then there is NO requirement to file a Tax Return in relation to the Vodafone “Return of Value” unless of course, these individuals are otherwise required to do so under a different section of the Taxes Consolidation Acts 1997.
The loss arising on the “Return of Value” can be carried forward. It can be written off against gains that may arise in the future. This may result in a reduced Capital Gains Tax liability in that tax year.
If a taxpayer prefers to have his / her “Return of Value” of €1,000 or less treated as Income, this information must be included in his / her annual Income Tax Return as outlined in Revenue’s Tax Briefing dated 14th May 2014.
Please be aware that the information contained in this article is of a general nature. It is not intended to address specific circumstances in relation to any individual or entity. All reasonable efforts have been made by Accounts Advice Centre to provide accurate and up-to-date information, however, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate on the date it is received or that it will continue to remain so. This information should not be acted upon without full and comprehensive, specialist professional tax advice.